JoePgh
Cranky pants and wise acre
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 3,756
- Reaction Score
- 22,104
Apparently South Carolina also played an exhibition game against a D2 school recently, but I have not seen it. But now that we have seen the UConn post players in action, and since we have seen their Gamecock counterparts in games against UConn last year (including Cardoso when she played for Syracuse), the question arises as to which set of post players has the advantage.
I think I would honestly be inclined to give the edge to South Carolina, mainly because UConn has no one who is a real matchup for Aliyah Boston. But the advantage is not clearcut. If the SC starters are Boston and Cardoso (as I would expect), then I have to think that Boston would play away from the basket and would be taking shots from 10 to 15 feet. Unlike UConn's posts other than Dorka, Boston can hit those shots at a good percentage, so this would be a real threat in conjunction with Cardoso in the low post. I am not sure how good a passer Boston or any of their other posts are, however -- I suspect that this has not received a lot of attention in South Carolina's offensive planning. So if UConn can make the passes difficult (both from the guards to the post and from the high post to the low post), that could make the Gamecocks' offense grind and falter.
I do think that the UConn post players can rebound as well or better than the SC bigs, so I don't think SC would score an inordinate number of second-chance points. But on the other hand, I think UConn post players are more prone to foul trouble than the SC players -- and that could be a big problem when the two teams play.
I think UConn will have a clear advantage on the perimeter, and will shoot from the perimeter with much better efficiency than SC. It's just a question of whether UConn's defense can force the guards to take shots, i.e., deny or greatly impair their ability to feed the post.
I'm focusing on South Carolina rather than Stanford or any other team (such as Maryland) both because there is a good chance that UConn and SC will play twice during the regular season, and because the SC players are familiar to UConn fans who watched the games in the last two years. South Carolina won two years ago by nearly 20 points, and lost to UConn last year in overtime. Before that, UConn won all the previous contests quite handily. So something seemed to change when Aaliyah Boston arrived in Columbia. UConn has had more trouble dealing with her than with A'ja Wilson or any other post player that they have had. That will most likely continue in the current year.
On a related point, does anyone know why Laeticia Amihere played ahead of Aaliyah Edwards on the Canadian National team? Based on what I have observed of their productivity on their college teams, Edwards has appeared to me to be more productive. So why didn't the Canadian coaches see it that way?
I think I would honestly be inclined to give the edge to South Carolina, mainly because UConn has no one who is a real matchup for Aliyah Boston. But the advantage is not clearcut. If the SC starters are Boston and Cardoso (as I would expect), then I have to think that Boston would play away from the basket and would be taking shots from 10 to 15 feet. Unlike UConn's posts other than Dorka, Boston can hit those shots at a good percentage, so this would be a real threat in conjunction with Cardoso in the low post. I am not sure how good a passer Boston or any of their other posts are, however -- I suspect that this has not received a lot of attention in South Carolina's offensive planning. So if UConn can make the passes difficult (both from the guards to the post and from the high post to the low post), that could make the Gamecocks' offense grind and falter.
I do think that the UConn post players can rebound as well or better than the SC bigs, so I don't think SC would score an inordinate number of second-chance points. But on the other hand, I think UConn post players are more prone to foul trouble than the SC players -- and that could be a big problem when the two teams play.
I think UConn will have a clear advantage on the perimeter, and will shoot from the perimeter with much better efficiency than SC. It's just a question of whether UConn's defense can force the guards to take shots, i.e., deny or greatly impair their ability to feed the post.
I'm focusing on South Carolina rather than Stanford or any other team (such as Maryland) both because there is a good chance that UConn and SC will play twice during the regular season, and because the SC players are familiar to UConn fans who watched the games in the last two years. South Carolina won two years ago by nearly 20 points, and lost to UConn last year in overtime. Before that, UConn won all the previous contests quite handily. So something seemed to change when Aaliyah Boston arrived in Columbia. UConn has had more trouble dealing with her than with A'ja Wilson or any other post player that they have had. That will most likely continue in the current year.
On a related point, does anyone know why Laeticia Amihere played ahead of Aaliyah Edwards on the Canadian National team? Based on what I have observed of their productivity on their college teams, Edwards has appeared to me to be more productive. So why didn't the Canadian coaches see it that way?