Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 3809965, member: 3535"] Well I think you are taking my posts way out of context. IMO, as I've mentioned before, when you get dug in you throw everything out there. Please provide the link where I was "offended." When it came to AM how many times did I say IF IF IF IF she would become the number 1 option from 3pt range because if I said IF CWiIll didn't perform she could become it top option IF she hit her shots. I referred to Anna that she had to hit her shots didn't I? I said it "was possible" she could, right? Go back on all my posts on that thread and see how often I used the word IF when it came to Anna. And you are saying I was "offended?" And I predicted ONO as 3rd team A/a before season started - but doesn't it stand to reason that she had to play other stars? I had said she was going to outplay the Miss State center. Never had a chance for that have we? Never had a chance to go against Louisville. To go against Baylor. And to get back on track with your post you said "[B]keep [U]pretending[/U] [SIZE=5]UCONN[/SIZE] be fine" [/B] " Some Synonyms for "pretend" are "Sham" "Bluff" "Fudge" "Hoodwink." "DELUDE." None of those words including "pretend" are appropriate for [SIZE=5]UCONN[/SIZE]- are they? If so - where are fans "pretending" over the next few years with UCONN? You said [SIZE=5]UCONN[/SIZE] here. Not a player. I'm not arguing yet. But where is the "pretend" for this team when it comes to championships? Are you suggesting UCONN has no shot this year and next several because they haven't landed the number 1 post? If you think they are title worthy then where is the "pretend" with UCONN? You said UCONN - not a player. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,488

Messages: 4,398,368

Members: 10,212

Latest member: MurrDog