At the moment, Kyla looks far better than Batouly. Faster, better conditioned, etc. But that also figures because Camara has been sitting due to injury.+1
Could easily have fallen off the cliff after last year, and, with Batouly coming in, could have felt marginalized, but she got into fantastic shape and has just kept plugging. Her mom is obviously a real fighter, too, and I think Kyla will continue to surprise to the upside. A gritty, model kid who deserves all the best.
Loved his comments about finding something she’s good at and focusing on that. He said she gets it. He did say that this and last years freshman classes are behind others they’ve had.
At the moment, Kyla looks far better than Batouly. Faster, better conditioned, etc. But that also figures because Camara has been sitting due to injury.
Kyla has a lot of heart but playing for Uconn she is a 20/20/20 player. She would do well against the competition that Natalie is playing against this year!
Kyla's future is in coaching, not playing in the WNBA, and I think she knows it. The best place to learn is at UConn.Her mom's a coach, and, after UConn and maybe some pro ball, she'll be in a terrific position to be one herself.
I thought that was the case--freshmen struggling more than normal. Crystal and Meg are the obvious exceptions.Loved his comments about finding something she’s good at and focusing on that. He said she gets it. He did say that this and last years freshman classes are behind others they’ve had.
At the moment, Kyla looks far better than Batouly. Faster, better conditioned, etc. But that also figures because Camara has been sitting due to injury.
On one hand, I think you're right: she'd be a more dominate, prominent, and significant player in a weaker conference. On the other, as I've discussed before, somebody's gotta be the depth, the 8th/9th/10th+ player on a powerful team. The downside is, as you suggest, playing time will be less. The upside is, big crowds, good travel, television time, conference titles, Final Fours, and, quite possibly, National Championship rings.
Not everybody values playing time over these other positives; some do, some don't.
I guess what I'm saying is, the decision to be a "supporting actor" for UConn instead of a "lead actor" for a Richmond, or George Mason, or whomever, isn't necessarily a poor reflection on the heart or fire of the player. It's certainly to UConn's advantage, to have quality, motivated depth that accepts and embraces the role.