Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BigErnMcCracken, post: 2773112, member: 70"] I'm not taking issue with the notion that NCAA violations provide grounds to terminate for cause. Anyone who's seen the contract would agree with that. I'm asking whether you agree with me that the University is invoking purported NCAA violations that they would unquestionably ignore (and have previously ignored) had last year's team won more games. When you strip away your snide comments it sounds like you agree with me. You and your buddies in this thread seem obsessed with whether or not UConn is technically correct in claiming cause - that doesn't seem like a very hard question to me. I'm more interested in why everyone outside of UConn seems to see UConn, as opposed to Ollie, as the bad actor in this scenario. Might be the same reason why schools don't typically dig their heels in on ____ like this. [/QUOTE]