Kevin DeMille on Diana Taurasi
- Thread starter YoDore
- Start date
diggerfoot
Humanity Hiker
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2011
- Messages
- 1,600
- Reaction Score
- 9,034
This causes me to contrast again the intangibles of our greats,
Taurasi: Just as DeMille stated, an intangible best suited for a young team that needs to believe that they belong in the big time.
Moore: Unparalleled work ethic and determination, best suited for teams with underachieving stars who need that ethic instilled in them, such as the first draft pick studded yet underachieving Lynx before Moore came along.
Stewart: Unstressed and seemingly effortless on the court, best for a team that plays too tight sometimes, such as UConn against their nemesis Notre Dame until the freshman Stewart lit them up in the FF.
Bueckers: The most savvy and efficient player I have witnessed. Good for guiding teams that for whatever reason (cough, injuries), do not get enough practice and playing reps in to perform smoothly.
Taurasi: Just as DeMille stated, an intangible best suited for a young team that needs to believe that they belong in the big time.
Moore: Unparalleled work ethic and determination, best suited for teams with underachieving stars who need that ethic instilled in them, such as the first draft pick studded yet underachieving Lynx before Moore came along.
Stewart: Unstressed and seemingly effortless on the court, best for a team that plays too tight sometimes, such as UConn against their nemesis Notre Dame until the freshman Stewart lit them up in the FF.
Bueckers: The most savvy and efficient player I have witnessed. Good for guiding teams that for whatever reason (cough, injuries), do not get enough practice and playing reps in to perform smoothly.