Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Mr. French, post: 5301378, member: 2292"] Money aside, and I know that's not a realistic view, but I always found it odd that someone would argue about a school consistently being top 25 with some top 10s but rarely winning big as a better option than having our ups and downs with mostly being excellent but sometimes being poopy. Were those years like 2007 and 2012 great fun? Not necessarily, but I'd rather have those in between 2 chips in 5 years rather than 5 straight years of being top 10 but never getting to a F4, for example. [/QUOTE]