Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Vowelguy, post: 5172358, member: 59"]
I averaged the rankings for the teams within each conference. 
(Hopefully there's not some statistical property of KenPom that makes averaging the ratings inappropriate.)

Simple Average
[LIST=1]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]SEC 21.2[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]BiG 17.5[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]B12 17.4[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]BgE 13.6[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]PAC 11.1  <-- if it were a conference now*[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]ACC 10.5[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]MWC 6.2[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]WCC 4.9[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]A10 4.5[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]AAC 1.9[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]CUSA 1.8[/FONT][/SIZE]
[*][SIZE=5][FONT=courier new]MVC 0.6[/FONT][/SIZE]
[/LIST]

Weighted Average (using a normal-type distribution, eg 1-2-3-4-5-4-3-2-1)
[LIST=1]
[*]SEC 20.8
[*]BiG 17.6
[*]B12 16.8
[*]BgE 13.8
[*]PAC 11.8
[*]ACC 9.8
[*]MWC 7.3
[*]WCC 5.3
[/LIST]
* PAC assumed membership of OSU, WSU, 5 MW, Gonz, TexasSt

So, on a disappointing day, at least nice to see the ACC behind the new PAC
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach