Mike Honcho
I've lost count of titles
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,451
- Reaction Score
- 8,734
Why else would Napier take that shot as time expired? Can't imagine Calhoun was too happy with the execution.
Just be glad he has the balls to want to take that shot.
Why else would Napier take that shot as time expired? Can't imagine Calhoun was too happy with the execution.
Really? You guys don't think Shabazz was picturing Pitt the sequel? A swish as the red border of the backboard lit up? That's sure what it looked like to me. There's no reason to start a set with 7 seconds to go from half court. Start at 10 from the 3 point line.
Loved his grit to get us back in the game but his decision-making skills have left something to be desired, especially at the end of games, as evidenced by his fifth foul.
Thrilled we won, despite the rebounding situation. Let's keep it going vs. Cuse.
Go away.
Would have had to hit the (much envied) MSG ceiling as a rainbow jumper because he took the shot with over four seconds on the clock. I think he was putting up a shot with enough time left for the bigs to get an o board and possible putback.
this is dumb, if no one wants the ball be glad he had the balls to take the last shot if he can shot... its not kemba envy is called being a leader and stepping up when no one will
yeah idk why either... dunk of the yearListen at this point I don't know and care too much about what we are arguing about (I'm not even sure if we are arguing) but I'm staring at your gif and I'm thinking why does lamb not take it to the rim that hard more often...I know we are not playing Columbia everyday but that was a nasty dunk he threw down on a seven footer. freaky long arms + good hops (should) = sportcenter top ten at least once a week.
Not sure I agree with this. Had they been down one or two, yes that takes balls. The game wasn't 'on the line'. It was tied. Worst case scenario, they have the chance to win it in OT, as they did.
I'd rather he have the balls to drive the lane and make something happen. Settling for a deep three doesn't take balls, regardless of whether you're in the zone.
this
So which was it, Kemba envy or a lack of balls to take it into the lane? I'm confused now.
It could be that someone is just trying to justify a ****ty original post.
first, i was just quoting part of a post that i agreed with which has nothing to do with kemba. i think Bazz should have penetrated and attacked the basket rather than settle for 3 (you'd be in the minority if you didn't feel that way). attack the basket with about 5 seconds left, maybe draw a foul, throw it up on the rim with roughly 2 seconds left and then theres also a chance for a put back. driving not only invites the opporutnity for a possible foul but it also creates a better opportunity for a put-back becasue the bigs have to commit to the drive and are slightly out of position when they need to block out.
and it certainly doesnt take balls. he was hot and he was obviously the person to be taking the last shot, saying he has balls to pull up from there isnt really the best way to describe it. the smarter and high probablity of scoring play would have been to attack the rim, its that simple.