Given his physical size that approximates Chris Paul, Kemba has to become nearly as good as him in order to get an Olympian spot. If CP3 opts out which is doubtful, then there's Williams, Wall, Irving, Dillard, and Lawson to compete against. However, Kemba as backup PG in the 2018 World Championship isn't impossible. Heinrich of Chicago Bulls snagged one in 2008. And Kemba is much better than Heinrich.
Me thinks Jeremy Lin could get an invite if his 2013-14 season kicks up a notch - like what happened in Linsanity - but needs a full year to showcase consistency. BTW, does anyone know why Rondo is not on the Olympic team?
Kyrie is great and poised to be one of the best PGs in the league, but he's got a LOT of work to do defensively to be there with Rose and CP3.
Unfortunately I don't think Kemba had a great shot to make the team because the NBA is loaded with talented point guards nowadays. As for Drummond, I think he has a decent chance to make the team because so few players have his kind of physical abilities. Tyson Chandler was the starting center on Team USA for the last team and Drummond is the same kind of player, but bigger and a better athlete. He'll have his best shot at making it if the coaches understand how good he's going to be in 2-3 years.
I don't agree that Irving is way better than Wall. Wall made a huge leap at the end of last season (24, 8, and 5 on 47/37/79 shooting splits) and nobody really seemed to notice because the Wizards were so far out of contention. The entie perception of Wall and Irving is strange to me. Irving is viewed as a budding superstar and Wall is viewed as a disappointment, meanwhile, Wall is three months older and putting up virtually identical numbers.
Kyrie also isn't nearly the athlete Wall is.
That doesn't mean a whole lot. Kyrie has had a brighter first two years than Wall's first three years. They both played on awful teams too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk