Good word choice.Quite the tumultuous career for him.
They're not snake-bitten.
They recruit horrific academic risks and then suffer the consequences when those risks become grenades.
Or when you're a top recruit and back out of your commitment to Pitt and end up at Auburn. Yes, Mustapha Heron, I mean you.When a kid that highly touted ends up picking between SMU and Texas Tech there's usually a reason the big boys have stayed away.
Or when you're a top recruit and back out of your commitment to Pitt and end up at Auburn. Yes, Mustapha Heron, I mean you.
That's the first thing I thought of but really don't know enough about he kid. I mean he just seems to be too good to have ended with the list he had too.
Is the UNC scandal worse than the SMU scandal on the scandal scale?Larry Brown doesn't have the UNC apparatus in place there.
They're not snake-bitten.
They recruit horrific academic risks and then suffer the consequences when those risks become grenades.
Was wondering the same thingIs the UNC scandal worse than the SMU scandal on the scandal scale?
UNc basically created an entire major for jocks and did it for years. SMU was just getting started.Was wondering the same thing
Is the UNC scandal worse than the SMU scandal on the scandal scale?
UNC basically created an entire major for jocks and did it for years. SMU was just getting started.
The only reason regular students got in the classes was the frats found out about it. Which ended up getting UNC off the hook initially.Depends on whose scale. On the NCAA's? Not at all. On regular people's? Absolutely.
UNC's is the single worst collegiate academic (heck, maybe any type) scandal of all time. Which is why I don't get that there isn't the uproar out there.
Not just for jocks. They allowed regular students to take those classes. The school was effectively a fraud degree factory.
The only reason regular students got in the classes was the frats found out about it. Which ended up getting UNC off the hook initially.