Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 3589202, member: 3535"] You have a link that it's not a ranking? They call Fudd POY but she is not POY? You have to understand I have a certain skepticism with your pov on this subject. On that thread you made the below comment in bold: And your initial posts on the thread seems like you were pushing Jones. But the below comment it seems like you want to regard POY based on seniority? **I am not arguing -- I just find these comments odd and when you look back on that thread right from the get-go you seem to be pushing Jones. Am I wrong? I apologize if I am. I don';t want to further go down this path. You reply and I won't post a counter to it. -------------------------------------- [B]I think Fudd should've finished third among that trio: Jones, Bueckers, Fudd. [U]She has two more years to collect awards[/U] which seem in the bank at this point. ---------------------------------------------------[/B] [/QUOTE]