What is the benefit of staying with a relatively weak basketball league? The Big East football schools would actually be at least equal, probably better as a basketball league. Temple, Memphis, UConn Cincinatti are all as good or better than anyone in the CYO league. Georgetown and Marquette are fine, but after that its pretty sketchy. When was the last time Seton Hall was relevant to anyone? And please don't tell me St Johns is in any way significant any more. The last time they were a factor they had to cheat to do it and their coach got canned mid-season. This foolish pining for the old days of the Big East ignores the fact that in recent years it has been UConn, Pittsburgh, West Virginia, Louisville, Cincinnatti, Syracuse that have been the power programs. Georgetown and to a lesser extent Marquette and Villanova have been supporting actors, not prime time players. It isn't 1985 any more.
It all depends on who else is added to each league:
UConn, Cincy, Memphis, Temple, USF, UCF, SMU, Houston, Tulane
vs
UConn, Cincy, Georgetown, Marquette, Seton Hall, Providence, Saint John's, Villanova, DePaul
Can the CYO league add someone like Butler, Creighton?
Who would the non-CYO league add? UTEP? UAB? Marshall? ECU? Buffalo? UNLV (too far), SDSU (too far).
The 9 starters for each league are pretty even, but once you add on to get to 12+ then it starts to get weaker on the non-CYO side. So the question is, how big do you go?