Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="billybud, post: 4787033, member: 3850"] It seems to me that the argument seems to be...either or. As if being good in basketball means not being good at football.... UConn can and will remain to be very good at basketball, and the northeast is more basketball centric than football. Can UConn be good at football ? Sure...but some may need to adjust their definition of "good". UConn may never be competitive with the top half of P4 conferences, but could be 8-2 like current SMU in the AAC (only losses to Oklahoma and TCU, from P4 conferences). [/QUOTE]