- Joined
- Feb 10, 2012
- Messages
- 3,333
- Reaction Score
- 5,054
Is that a bad thing?
Against BC it was the same thing. Bazz with the ball at the top of the key, uconn players standing around and then either a 3-point shot or a mid-range jumper from Bazz. sometimes it's a drive and foul.
Very Kemba-esque. Especially if we win.
If Napier is on, it works. But it doesn't seem to help the flow of the offense. DD had 20 points in the 1st half against BC. Maybe 2 or 3 in the 2nd. He was pretty non-existent against IU. very disappointing after it seemed like he was coming out against BC in the first 20 minutes.
if we can win with bazz running 60-70% of the offense, run it until they stop him. but it just seems like the offense stagnates with that approach, and then it takes a herculean effort from Bazz to pull out the win. Personally, I would rather see better distribution as this team has a lot of players that can score.
Against BC it was the same thing. Bazz with the ball at the top of the key, uconn players standing around and then either a 3-point shot or a mid-range jumper from Bazz. sometimes it's a drive and foul.
Very Kemba-esque. Especially if we win.
If Napier is on, it works. But it doesn't seem to help the flow of the offense. DD had 20 points in the 1st half against BC. Maybe 2 or 3 in the 2nd. He was pretty non-existent against IU. very disappointing after it seemed like he was coming out against BC in the first 20 minutes.
if we can win with bazz running 60-70% of the offense, run it until they stop him. but it just seems like the offense stagnates with that approach, and then it takes a herculean effort from Bazz to pull out the win. Personally, I would rather see better distribution as this team has a lot of players that can score.