Is Julius Randle 6'9"? | The Boneyard

Is Julius Randle 6'9"?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,743
Reaction Score
48,443
I watched him quite a bit last night, and the kid is a really solid player. Bulky too. But he looked 6'7" to me. Anyone else notice that he is SF length?

Don't get me wrong, he's a legit NBA PF, but maybe in the Elton Brand or Charles Barkley mold.

Still, I'm not sure I take him in the top 3 or 4 ahead of Wiggins, Parker, Smart or even, gulp, Embiid.

Randle of the top guys scares me a bit, though I think he has a great deal of ability. It's his height that I'm concerned with.
 

caw

Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,369
Reaction Score
13,971
I watched him quite a bit last night, and the kid is a really solid player. Bulky too. But he looked 6'7" to me. Anyone else notice that he is SF length?

Don't get me wrong, he's a legit NBA PF, but maybe in the Elton Brand or Charles Barkley mold.

Still, I'm not sure I take him in the top 3 or 4 ahead of Wiggins, Parker, Smart or even, gulp, Embiid.

Randle of the top guys scares me a bit, though I think he has a great deal of ability. It's his height that I'm concerned with.

Him and Gordon need to measure well to leap frog Wiggins/Parker, for me. If he's 6-9 or taller barefoot Randle could easily go number 1. Or if has absurdly long arms (Brand).
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
14,016
Reaction Score
74,825
He was 6-10 in shoes at the Nike Skills Academy. I'd take him before Wiggins, no question. Every scout I've heard talk about him mentions how much bigger and stronger he seems in person. He's really a unique player.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,919
Reaction Score
10,570
randle needs to work on his offensive game ; at this point his only translatable skill to the next level is his rebounding. He simply bullies people in college , and struggles against length. He doesn't have the skill set of say , a zach Randolph. Oh he has nice open court ball handeling too. Don't see webber , more like a less athletic griffin/thomas robknson if anything. He's got an average wingspan but totally worth a top edit: lotto pick.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,743
Reaction Score
48,443
He was 6-10 in shoes at the Nike Skills Academy. I'd take him before Wiggins, no question. Every scout I've heard talk about him mentions how much bigger and stronger he seems in person. He's really a unique player.

That's interesting. It may just be he's in a crouch ready to leap when he's out there on the floor. But he was looking no bigger than the SFs without the ball.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
9,382
Reaction Score
23,714
He was 6-10 in shoes at the Nike Skills Academy. I'd take him before Wiggins, no question. Every scout I've heard talk about him mentions how much bigger and stronger he seems in person. He's really a unique player.

I think any GM that passes Wiggins up is going to regret it. That kid is a special talent, and unlike Parker and Randle, he can impact a game on both sides of the floor. I know he's not as refined as Parker and Randle, but you watch him execute a flawless step-back jumper like he did at the end of the first half last night, or effortlessly score in the open court one on two, and I just can't imagine him not going #1.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
14,016
Reaction Score
74,825
randle needs to work on his offensive game ; at this point his only translatable skill to the next level is his rebounding. He simply bullies people in college , and struggles against length. He doesn't have the skill set of say , a zach Randolph. Oh he has nice open court ball handeling too. Don't see webber , more like a less athletic griffin/thomas robknson if anything. He's got an average wingspan but totally worth a top edit: lotto pick.

I don't know. He's been bullying people because, let's face it, he's a grown man playing against boys, but he's pretty skilled for a big guy. Handles the ball well too. Much more skilled than either Griffin or Robinson.
 

uconnbill

A Half full kind of guy
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,576
Reaction Score
15,264
He is exceptional, but I still favor Parker with Wiggins third
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,158
Reaction Score
6,437
If I'm a GM, here's how I rank the top prospects:

1) Andrew Wiggins - While he's not the most refined player right now, you draft based on how you project these players down the road. Wiggins is a special talent and will have a major impact on both sides of the ball. He's the most explosive player of the bunch and you can see he's got a nice skill-set to build off of. It may take him a couple years to realize how good he is, but once he does, I think he'll be the best player of the bunch. Also, in a similar vein to Drummond, I think the spacing of the NBA game will benefit him.

2) Jabari Parker - In my mind, he's the only other one I'd even think about at #1. He's just so skilled and has such a great feel for the game. He seems like the most "sure thing". He's got the build and similar athleticism to Melo while also being a versatile scorer, but plays more within the flow of the game without forcing shots. I wonder if he'll initially struggle to adjust to the bigger/longer/faster athletes in the NBA, but he's skilled enough to be a very good player regardless.

3) Dante Exum - He's the hardest guy to pin since he's not playing NCAA ball, but he's a tall, long, athletic and skilled PG. We see the kind of success Carter-Williams (6-6 PG) has had so far in the NBA, and Exum appears to have a more consistent outside shot as well. A lot of the top players in the NBA nowadays are point guards, and Exum has to tools to be among the league's best.

4) Julius Randle - I love how he plays with an attitude and isn't afraid to bang down low, but with average length, I don't think he'll be the best defender, and I also worry how he'll adjust playing NBA size and length consistently. He seems crafty though, so I think he also seems like a pretty "safe" pick (assuming he measures fine).

5) Marcus Smart - I could actually see Smart being a bust since he doesn't have elite athleticism and isn't overly skilled for a PG, but the kid is just a winner. He's intelligent and every coach and player around him constantly sings his praises. High character guy and is supposedly a hard worker, so I wouldn't doubt he'll develop a better shooting stroke and understanding of leading an offense.

6) Joel Embiid - If he's only been playing for four years, he's got some great instincts on the offensive end. He's fluid, has legitimate size, and has some natural touch around the hoop. Still needs to rebound better, and is prone to defensive lapses, but with his size he should be effective in those areas. He's not the elite athlete Drummond is (HOW did he possibly fall to ninth?!), but he moves nicely for a big, and NBA-types love drafting size early.

7) Aaron Gordon - A lot will depend on how he measures. If he's below 6'9", he seems like he's a classic "tweener", but if he has legit height, I can understand the Blake Griffin comparisons. Freak athlete, but isn't very skilled, and if he doesn't have good enough size.... he'll struggle in the NBA.

I'm sure this will change as the season goes on and I see more of each player, but as someone who's a huge fan of both college ball and the NBA, the NBA Draft is one of my favorite times of the year. Having this much talent in one draft (top heavy and deep) makes me giddy.

I'd still take our veteran Huskies and Shabazz over these frosh in the NCAA tournament though.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
10,442
Reaction Score
34,841
Wiggins as #1 is a pretty easy decision to me, you're drafting him based on what you think he could be, not what he is right now. Paul George went 10th and couldn't create his own shot in the WAC, he could only hit spot up or 1 to 2 dribble jumpers or showcase his athletic abiltity in the lane. I'm sure there's alot GMs who wish they could do that 2010 draft over with George now the 3rd best SF in the game and one of the best two way players, and Wiggins obviously has a better rep and is further along than George was at the same stage.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,743
Reaction Score
48,443
Andrew Wiggins is the closest thing I've seen to Len Bias in the last 30 years.

Celtics are getting the #2 choice in the lottery this year, and some nitwit is going to pass up Wiggins allowing the Celtics to finally grab their wing 28 years later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: caw
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,919
Reaction Score
10,570
I don't know. He's been bullying people because, let's face it, he's a grown man playing against boys, but he's pretty skilled for a big guy. Handles the ball well too. Much more skilled than either Griffin or Robinson.
I agree he has a better skill set at 18 than either of those guys had. but I've also heard he's been a bad defender even in HS. Which is alarming. he needs to hit more than 1 jumpshot too this year, that's breadnbutter in the league ; not that wild spin move.
Parker looks like a prototypical 3 on offense , but can he defend his position at all ? Coach K hides the crap out of him , playing him against slow 5s. Wiggins next gear is frightening, guarantee he's just gonna get better as games go on.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
959
Reaction Score
476
Wiggins=Drummond: may not floor you day to day in college; but will have you questioning your sanity if you pass him up in 3 years. Has all the tools
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,257
Reaction Score
133,340
Wiggins=Drummond: may not floor you day to day in college; but will have you questioning your sanity if you pass him up in 3 years. Has all the tools

That's basically it.

There are some guys who are just going to be better pros when they're free to do nothing but basketball.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
287
Guests online
2,614
Total visitors
2,901

Forum statistics

Threads
160,161
Messages
4,219,345
Members
10,082
Latest member
Basingstoke


.
Top Bottom