Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="ctchamps, post: 2635280, member: 37"]
And the last statement is the key.  We believe the best way to invalidate an act we disagree about is to engage  and attack.  In an actual conflict, after detailed information gathering, it might be prudent.  In a virtual environment where the actors remain anonymous it’s a futile endeavor.

You possess an astute mind.  Why waste it in an engagement you can’t win and which produces no outcome to events other than some deceptive feeling that we’re winning?

The emotionally healthiest among us see not only other peoples flaws but our own.  We insist on working on these flaws as opposed to making others change because we falsely believe that is easier.

Specifically instead of feeling lousy when you perceive someone is being idiotic figure out a way to become unaffected by the trigger.  The hard part is to be willing to feel your emotions when this happens and to let them release (in a manner that’s least likely to hurt others) as opposed to burying them.  People who do that are measured but it will ultimately impact their health.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach