Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="caw, post: 4572687, member: 563"] Don't disagree, but X and UConn had pretty similar overall metrics by NET in terms of Quad wins. NET and Quad wins are not the only thing the committee looks at. The head to head losses and the lack of road wins are the only difference. If you are trying to make sense of the committees choice those are the two things you can look at. X was 9-6, 4-2, 4-1, 8-0 UConn was 7-6, 6-1, 4-1, 8-0 I don't agree with it. I would look more at quality OOC wins and wins against the field. There are arguments both ways, so all you can do is try and find the metrics the committee might have used. UConn had better OOC wins and better wins against the field. X had the head to head and more road wins. [/QUOTE]