OkaForPrez
Really Popular Poster
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 5,207
- Reaction Score
- 26,712
Interesting stat insight in research today: I have to update my dataset, but from 2002 - 2011 top seeded teams (1-5) who lost in the first round had an average absolute difference of 40 in KenPom AdjO vs. AdjD rank. Top seeded teams who won in the first round have an avg difference of 20. Meaning the more unbalanced a team is on one side of the ball vs. the other, the more likely they are to get sniped.
Look at recent history (adjO, Adj D, Diff):
2014 Duke - (2, 116, 114) Ohio State - (128, 3, 125) VCU - (107, 6, 101)
2013 GTown - (78, 2, 76) Wisconsin ( 108, 1, 107)
2012 Duke - (10, 81, 71) Missouri (1, 146, 145)
Note these are post tourney ranks because I'm not a kenpom subscriber and I'm sure there is a general bias effect where the count of top seed winners is far greater than the count of top seed losers and therefore the average would tighten up anyway, but the data backs what we know anyway: Unbalanced teams get exposed.
Red Flag on Grant and the Irish this year, The Mayor and the Clones and less so, the Tarheels.
Look at recent history (adjO, Adj D, Diff):
2014 Duke - (2, 116, 114) Ohio State - (128, 3, 125) VCU - (107, 6, 101)
2013 GTown - (78, 2, 76) Wisconsin ( 108, 1, 107)
2012 Duke - (10, 81, 71) Missouri (1, 146, 145)
Note these are post tourney ranks because I'm not a kenpom subscriber and I'm sure there is a general bias effect where the count of top seed winners is far greater than the count of top seed losers and therefore the average would tighten up anyway, but the data backs what we know anyway: Unbalanced teams get exposed.
Red Flag on Grant and the Irish this year, The Mayor and the Clones and less so, the Tarheels.