Interesting announcing technique | The Boneyard

Interesting announcing technique

Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
3,004
Reaction Score
8,490
So this pair of announcers have a slightly different formula to deal with a blowout. Unlike ESPN, whose people chat about irrelevancies, these two occasionally broke into chat but often simply said nothing, leaving the audience to figure out everything that was going on. At one point the ball went up and down the court three times before they opened their mouths. All I know is they are not getting paid by the word. :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
11,827
Reaction Score
17,832
I kind of liked the low key announcing tonight at least as a change of pace. ESPN has just gotten too loud, too chatty, and all about hyperbole, and promoting their upcoming events, basically focused on everything else but the game at hand.
 
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
320
Reaction Score
2,484
Announcing has become talking about everything but the game being played. Tonight in the second half, UCONN made three fouls and not once did either announcer identify who committed the fouls. They also never mentioned Batouly being in the game. Nothing personal, but I really enjoy our SNY announcers so much better then those from the so called major networks. A lot of talk about nothing.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
11,827
Reaction Score
17,832
Announcing has become talking about everything but the game being played. Tonight in the second half, UCONN made three fouls and not once did either announcer identify who committed the fouls. They also never mentioned Batouly being in the game. Nothing personal, but I really enjoy our SNY announcers so much better then those from the so called major networks. A lot of talk about nothing.
Yeah I was pretty surprised when all of a sudden both teams were in the bonus. I was thinking to myself when did that happen?
 

meyers7

You Talkin’ To Me?
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
23,517
Reaction Score
60,894
That was some of the worst I've heard in long time. Finally just shut the sound off. Usually it doesn't bother me much, but tonight OMG.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
3,004
Reaction Score
8,490
Cripes! Batouly got in the game? When did that happen? Well, I guess it proves my point
 

Bigboote

That's big-boo-TAY
Joined
Dec 16, 2016
Messages
7,150
Reaction Score
36,504
I'm with meyers7. They left too much up to the viewers (is it a foul or an out-of-bounds, who's in the game, etc.), while talking about nothing really relevant. Even in the first half.

Edited to add after seeing tomcat's post: Yes, they never mentioned Camara, nor Espinoza-Hunter, which blew my mind. AEH was in for at least 4 minutes, Camara for something like 3.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,651
Reaction Score
14,696
Announcing has become talking about everything but the game being played. Tonight in the second half, UCONN made three fouls and not once did either announcer identify who committed the fouls. They also never mentioned Batouly being in the game. Nothing personal, but I really enjoy our SNY announcers so much better then those from the so called major networks. A lot of talk about nothing.
Missing Bat Girl was a major blunder.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2016
Messages
635
Reaction Score
2,200
So this pair of announcers have a slightly different formula to deal with a blowout. Unlike ESPN, whose people chat about irrelevancies, these two occasionally broke into chat but often simply said nothing, leaving the audience to figure out everything that was going on. At one point the ball went up and down the court three times before they opened their mouths. All I know is they are not getting paid by the word. :rolleyes:

Maybe it's just me, but when the UCONN bench players enter the game, the announcers don't give us their names. Sure, it's a blowout but I'm yelling, "Who are they?" My bad, but these kids (frosh) are yet to be household names, and guessing the announcers don't know who they are. That's on them.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
3,004
Reaction Score
8,490
They're just lazy. They have a roster and are supposed to have learned it. That's part of any broadcaster's prep for the game. These two, the alleged play-by-play announcer especially, just found it easier to chat, when they said anything at all. Sometimes, as mentioned above, they just said nothing at all.
 

BigBird

Et In Hoc Signo Vinces
Joined
Nov 13, 2013
Messages
3,849
Reaction Score
10,566
Blow-out games are the hardest to do (ask me how I know), but there is no darned excuse for unprofessional indifference or a lack of effort.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
11,827
Reaction Score
17,832
At least we'll have an interesting mix of styles going forward with other networks picking up more of the Huskies games. ESPN, CBS, Fox, and SNY all broadcast the games. I'd rate them: SNY, CBS, Fox, ESPN.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2014
Messages
156
Reaction Score
503
I kind of liked the low key announcing tonight at least as a change of pace. ESPN has just gotten too loud, too chatty, and all about hyperbole, and promoting their upcoming events, basically focused on everything else but the game at hand.
Exactly, just like the Fox announcers covering any NFL games.
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
1,244
Reaction Score
4,761
I thought that, though these announcers were at least generally talking about WCBB, nobody seemed to do play by play. I mean, I dont need radio type narration, but at least give me the basics! It is too bad when viewers know less than those who can hear the arena announcer. And even early on, before the score was out of hand, they rarely discussed the great plays - especially if it happened during a "story". I think it really helps viewers enjoy the game when it seems like the commentators are enjoying it, or at least paying attention!
I wish the networks would tell one person to do the game and announce what is happening and talk right over the chatter if necessary.
 

Bliss

Mizzou Ballyhoo
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Messages
627
Reaction Score
936
Blow-out games are the hardest to do (ask me how I know), but there is no darned excuse for unprofessional indifference or a lack of effort.

Or lack of announcing talent.
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2016
Messages
2,037
Reaction Score
5,975
Announcing has become talking about everything but the game being played. Tonight in the second half, UCONN made three fouls and not once did either announcer identify who committed the fouls. They also never mentioned Batouly being in the game. Nothing personal, but I really enjoy our SNY announcers so much better then those from the so called major networks. A lot of talk about nothing.
I agree. When the commentators have nothing to say about the game, they should focus on who is playing, for both sides. Get us some background information, etc. Camara's appearance, for UCONN fans, was huge. And she drew nary a mention. Pretty lame work.
 
Joined
Feb 5, 2014
Messages
1,244
Reaction Score
4,761
I just rewatched the game. I wish they had given us more info on the actual game. (Have to admit they would have had to talk pretty quick to name all of DePaul's subs!) Hope that soon they can have a program that will scroll substitutes and perhaps relevant game stats during the game at the bottom of the screen.
Still, I think they were better than many other announcing teams in at least giving info or stories about the programs competing.
 

Online statistics

Members online
434
Guests online
2,249
Total visitors
2,683

Forum statistics

Threads
159,591
Messages
4,196,685
Members
10,066
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom