Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Phil, post: 2515747, member: 66"] So here's my theory, which I just made up but I'm sticking to it. The team I'll understand that Geno's goal is a perfect game. As has been well explained that doesn't mean 100% shooting, and it doesn't even mean zero turnovers. A well executed past to an open player who takes a shot and it just doesn't happen to go in doesn't disqualify the game as a perfect game. The USF game was a pretty good game but it wasn't perfect. But it was pretty good. The team heard Geno talk about it in to this surprise he didn't focus on the few mistakes they made he actually praised them for playing a pretty good game. So how on earth is that a problem? Because the team knows, in addition to Geno's quest for a perfect game, if there's ever a game that qualifies, he knows there's nothing more to be achieved and he will immediately retire. The team had a meeting and even though he can be a bit of a pain in practice they don't really want him to retire, so they decided to make sure the next game wasn't in a perfect game. Unfortunately, while their original plan was to pick one player to make sure the game fell short of perfection, they are all loyal teammates and they all decided to make sure it wasn't perfect. They achieve their goal Geno stays on to coach another game. [/QUOTE]