Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 4166895, member: 3535"] Appreciate your posts. Don’t take this the wrong way but this is why I created this thread. I don’t agree with your pov and those that feel as you do when it came to Nika last year. IMO if you ignore the stats I put up you’re just in major denial. All of a sudden she gets awarded significant minutes and on that day it's a miracle she starts to hit shots from 3? Then when she gets hurt she starts missing shots again and that’s called "mental gymnastics" to provide that as a reason that the injury affected her shot? Huh????? Freshmen get a break nearly all the time from us when they start to get their feet wet when we analyze on here- yet all of sudden we can’t do that for Nika? SO Carolyn Ducharme is now referred to as the leading scorer and that is okay because we disregard her early season not playing much even though CWill has a higher average? Yet when Muhl didn't play much we are supposed to use the stats while injured against her? We can agree to disagree. I created this thread because I disagree with posters such as yourself that have minimized the fact that she was a good shooter in 2021. (ie. My ttile -- In Defense of Nika Muhl). With respect fellow husky fan, I think you're wrong using statistical data when Muhl was hurt and getting her feet wet vs when Auriemma put her in the lineup and gave her significant minutes. These are 16 game stats that can’t be ignored. The factors being both hurt and getting her feet wet are far, far, far less relevant as is using Ducharme’s scoring average (prior to Paige and Azzi being hurt) as having any relevance. It’s not “mental gymnastics” – it’s “logic.” [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,444

Messages: 4,396,518

Members: 10,209

Latest member: gemini*trvl