Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 4196594, member: 3535"] We can agree to disagree on context. Read the Op's 1st post on this thread. Nowhere did he claim that UCONN was outmanned. He or she clearly made the comment of "team." There was a reference to players but it was clear the comment was about "team." He was referencing why the team was not having as much success. His context was about "Team" not about "player" though and not about "being outmanned." Instead the poster "AG" spoke of being "outmanned" when no such comment was made. He then when on to make mention of specific player’s H/S ratings then to mildly berate UCONN fans. And I should be given the same latitude that you have given AG. The poster mildly twisted the OP's comment/context of team into individual players-. by using the individual players rankings he certainly is using those as a barometer vs what the OP initially posted. Again the OP did not reference outmanned or individual player rankings. Using them incorrectly misrepresents the intent of "team." That's why I countered to him because imo H/s rankings have little to do with "team." College "rankings" for individual players and fundamentals and how each player fits are much more relevant than what AG was trying to represent. And I think you are missing the context of the post as well. Your interpretation of what the OP is faulty. Read his post again. he spoke of the team being "inconsistent." You're bringing up "winning." Using the word "inconsistent" should be inferred in context that UCONN is highly susceptible of continually getting picked off. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,446

Messages: 4,396,597

Members: 10,209

Latest member: gemini*trvl