Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Huskies Have A Little Break: What Needs To Change Before Texas?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 4803744, member: 3535"] I missed this before. For sure there are games we can win comfortably. And that is the perfect reason and time to give the minutes to the players you know are your better players in tight games. This team has little experience playing together. Why wouldn't UCONN want to give their best player's more time on the floor together? Comments have been made how the team hasn't played enough together - so now we're go to take out better players that need as much time as they can get vs an inferior player? And this has nothing to do with "fracture." In part it has to do with if the coach can't be taken for his word, then wouldn't it be plausible to assume a critical player might transfer afther the season is over? This isn't transferring speculation of a player but of a philosophy if a coach breaks his promise when tell players that Practices and Performances" matter when it's clear you play what some suggested Amari 25-30 minutes that it doesn't. Even 10 minutes if she isn't as good-- why? Why not give much of those last 10 minutes to Ice and better players especially if Patterson is better and she comes back? We've seen very few minutes of Ice and Edwards playing together yet it's clear Geno thinks Ice is quite a bit better. And last year Patterson was better and she needs minutes., And we've seen how critical Aubrey has been at the 4. These 4 players haven’t played one reg season together yet it's smart to have 3 of them sit for an inferior player just because she is 6'6? Height by itself is one of the most overrated points made on here. Last year how many 6'6 players did Iowa have when they beat SC? How many 6'6 players did LSU have when the won the title? SO, bottom-line is that we’re supposed to put a worse player in the game instead of playing the better players that prove it day over day in practice in which those players are desperate for playing time together. However, when we struggle or lose then one of the comments universally accepted is that the team hasn’t played enough together and yet playing the lesser player is one of the causes. So yes we lose a ton if playing Amari if she isn’t ready and not as good as the others . [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Huskies Have A Little Break: What Needs To Change Before Texas?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom