Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="visitingcock, post: 3823546, member: 6872"] I agree with you and concede that this is the worst of all years to rely on computers because their data is limited by the scarcity of interconference games. This is especially true when ranking Oregon and the rest of the PAC that has no games against worthy nonconference foes. AND I am not certain how far the reliance on NET rankings goes. Is it set in stone that the NET will make the determination on all non-conference champions or is it merely the guide to be used by a selection "committee?" If it rules in selection of the 64th team in, we should probably wait in using it until things return to normalcy. [/QUOTE]