Hail vowelguy! He is 100% correct in pointing out the problems inherent in rating recruiting classes. If you are trying to establish a top-twenty program, the Kentucky class is the way to go. Ask Geno. The problem is that Kentucky wants to become a mega-program like UConn ( or their own men's team) and their group of recruits doesn't cut it, at least on paper. They need stars. Big stars. Recruits are judged, in part, by how successfully they fill the needs of the team and improve it. (If all you need to win a national championship is to sign one particular player, and you do, it's a great class.) In Kentucky's case, the need is to get better everywhere. This is at best a sustaining class still leaving them looking up at Tennessee and South Carolina in the SEC, with UConn more than a million miles away.