Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 4854357, member: 1673"] ? I don’t know if this was addressed to, or at least prompted by me and my focus on efficiency, but best is a subjective term. The OP listed stats that seem to indicate he is focused on career efficiency. There is nothing wrong with that, just as there is nothing wrong with those posters that countered that they think Stewart is best because of career championships, or Moore is best because of career productivity, or Taurasi is best because of being clutch, or any criteria for combining different career achievements. I love watching beautiful basketball, I’ve stated that often enough, so my preference for best is going to be in terms of beauty and efficiency. The thing about efficiency is it does not depend as much on longevity as other types of “best.” So as long as Bueckers does not start tanking I do not feel the least misguided in saying she fits my own preference for best whenever her career is over. [/QUOTE]