Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="bendm, post: 3898982, member: 9151"] so what is kenpom and NET measuring in its metrics versus what is the ncaa trying to reward in terms of resumes, and where is the disconnect between the two? what accounts for these large disparities between metrics and resumes e.g. wichita in 2017 and UConn this year? imo the metrics should be used to inform/interprete the resume. for instance, at the end of the season you rerank every team by some combination of the metrics and then use those rankings to determine quadrant results and SOS etc [/QUOTE]