Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="DaveHuskiesFan, post: 3176253, member: 935"] We’re talking about the same Dyson right? The same Dyson who’s best year wasn’t better than Vitals last year, right? The only thing he did better than Vital was get to the rim. Worse 2 point %, worse 3 point %, worse FT%, worse rebounding, worse rebounding %. Similar steal numbers. More assists, but not a great A:TO ratio, and was great at getting to the line. Sure he played against better competition on better teams, but let’s not pretend he was a god. Put vital on those uconn teams with better talent, and he’s getting a hell of a lot more open looks than he does as the second option last year. This vital trashing is crazy, he had one of the better years a UConn guard has had in a while last year while as a second option the majority of the year between Adams and Gilbert out. You can take it even further if you want. Dysons best 2% year was lower than Vital last year. Dysons best 3% year was lower than Vital last year. Dysons best FT% year was lower than Vital last year. Dysons best rebounding year was lower than Vital last year. Dysons scored more than 14 points a game 1/4 years. Vital has done that 2/3 years. This is all while having a way higher usage than Vital. Peoples revisionist history is absurd. [/QUOTE]