OT: - How bad has ACC been this year? | The Boneyard

OT: How bad has ACC been this year?

Joined
Jan 6, 2015
Messages
7,311
Reaction Score
59,807
It didn't occur to me how bad the ACC is this year until recently when looking at the Bubble Watch.

Of course Duke is excellent, but if the season ended today, it looks like Wake Forest (good for Steve Forbes!) and Notre Dame are the only surefire teams getting in.

On a purely statistical level, here's how the ACC ranks according to KenPom

1645717042619.png


Just barely better than the MWC (which is very good this year) and its rating is closer to the AAC (2.12) than the Big East (3.21).

We knew going into the season that BC (kudos to Earl Grant, they've been better than expected) and Pitt were going to suck, but Georgia Tech, NC State, Louisville and Clemson have really disappointed...I would even argue Florida State has not met expectations too.
 
Joined
Dec 7, 2016
Messages
2,149
Reaction Score
15,988
I just re-visited the preseason AP Top 25. UNC, Florida State, and Virginia were all in there. Of those 3 teams, maybe UNC will make it to the tournament? Florida State and Virginia aren't even really close to the bubble. Crazy.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,031
Reaction Score
6,557
Whoever put Virginia in the preseason AP is an idiot.

The team lost Murphy, Huff, Hauser, Woldentensae, Morsell and McKoy.
Most of the writeups on us were something along the lines of "UVA lost 99.9% of it's offense and defense, but we can't imagine a tony bennett led squad not being ranked"....umm ok. Anyone who actually pays attention knew this was going to be a rough season for UVA, which actually got a bit hidden by how awful the ACC as a whole has been.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
8,335
Reaction Score
22,525
Of course Duke is excellent, but if the season ended today, it looks like Wake Forest (good for Steve Forbes!) and Notre Dame are the only surefire teams getting in.

When compared to the rest of the ACC, yes Duke is really good. They will still get 4 or more teams in.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
2,757
Reaction Score
9,310
Most of the writeups on us were something along the lines of "UVA lost 99.9% of it's offense and defense, but we can't imagine a tony bennett led squad not being ranked"....umm ok. Anyone who actually pays attention knew this was going to be a rough season for UVA, which actually got a bit hidden by how awful the ACC as a whole has been.
Sad - same thinking as "I think Duke will win the ACC regular season because I can't imagine a Coach K team that wouldn't win it".

Oh, wait, they haven't won it in over a decade.
 

Waquoit

Mr. Positive
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
33,320
Reaction Score
87,221
Could those who follow the ACC tell us if this is just a blip or a trend? And the only strong team is losing their coach. How good is that?
 

huskypantz

All posts from this user are AI-generated
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
7,054
Reaction Score
10,182
Could those who follow the ACC tell us if this is just a blip or a trend? And the only strong team is losing their coach. How good is that?
I don't follow the ACC but it would be reasonable to suggest that there are cycles in CBB and they happen to be on a downward cycle. UConn and the BE has been subject to them as well. They'll be back. Since you posted this, probably next year.
 

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,151
Reaction Score
22,013
With Houston, Cincy and UCF leaving, nobody can argue we're not blessed to be outta there
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
13,013
Reaction Score
70,689
Could those who follow the ACC tell us if this is just a blip or a trend? And the only strong team is losing their coach. How good is that?
Duke is still good, but likely will be down soon because K is leaving.
UNC is down because Roy left.
Syracuse is down because Jim hasn't left yet
UVA is down just based on a recruiting cycle. They'll be back soon.
FSU is down on a recruiting cycle due to early entrants. They'll be back soon.
Louisville is down because Chris Mack crashed and burned.

The rest of the programs have been beaten down by the above over time and are about the same as usual, which is to say not that great.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
3,777
Reaction Score
12,908
Duke is still good, but likely will be down soon because K is leaving.
UNC is down because Roy left.
Syracuse is down because Jim hasn't left yet
UVA is down just based on a recruiting cycle. They'll be back soon.
FSU is down on a recruiting cycle due to early entrants. They'll be back soon.
Louisville is down because Chris Mack crashed and burned.

The rest of the programs have been beaten down by the above over time and are about the same as usual, which is to say not that great.
I don't have much hatred towards Syracuse like most on the Boneyard, but that part made me laugh out loud, LMFAO
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
17,513
Reaction Score
22,909
The ACC really messed up its identity. It expanded north geographically but not effectively. It expanded south academically (L-ville). It is the complete opposite of what the B1G is. It's got publics, privates, catholics, commuters. duke is duke but it will drop off somewhat when K leaves. If UCONN, Maryland, and maybe even a Rutgers or Villanova filled in the gaps, it would be in a better basketball position. I still maintain if it had expanded with 6-8 Big East programs at one time it would have been a far better result. Those northeastern schools just don't belong in the current model. That's a shame

acc-map-complete.jpg
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
2,757
Reaction Score
9,310
The ACC really messed up its identity. It expanded north geographically but not effectively. It expanded south academically (L-ville). It is the complete opposite of what the B1G is. It's got publics, privates, catholics, commuters. duke is duke but it will drop off somewhat when K leaves. If UCONN, Maryland, and maybe even a Rutgers or Villanova filled in the gaps, it would be in a better basketball position. I still maintain if it had expanded with 6-8 Big East programs at one time it would have been a far better result. Those northeastern schools just don't belong in the current model. That's a shame

View attachment 73751
Football drove the bus and it went off the road a good bit in the aggregate.
 
Joined
Jan 6, 2015
Messages
7,311
Reaction Score
59,807
We were #21 preseason in 2006-07 after losing Gay, Armstrong, Boone, Williams, Anderson, Brown, and Nelson.
And entered the 06-07 season with the #4 ranked freshman class w/ Dyson, Thabeet, Wiggins, Stix, Kelly, Gavin Edwards and the Real Dove. The season was also the debut of AJ Price plus they had Jeff Adrien returning.

Virginia's '21 class was ranked 81st. Franklin/Gardner were good transfers, but you can't compare what UConn had coming in vs. UVA.
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
1,271
Reaction Score
3,151
It didn't occur to me how bad the ACC is this year until recently when looking at the Bubble Watch.

Of course Duke is excellent, but if the season ended today, it looks like Wake Forest (good for Steve Forbes!) and Notre Dame are the only surefire teams getting in.

On a purely statistical level, here's how the ACC ranks according to KenPom

View attachment 73704

Just barely better than the MWC (which is very good this year) and its rating is closer to the AAC (2.12) than the Big East (3.21).

We knew going into the season that BC (kudos to Earl Grant, they've been better than expected) and Pitt were going to suck, but Georgia Tech, NC State, Louisville and Clemson have really disappointed...I would even argue Florida State has not met expectations too.
So bad that Notre Dame looks good
 
Joined
Jan 6, 2015
Messages
7,311
Reaction Score
59,807
So bad that Notre Dame looks good
Notre Dame, along with Michigan State, is a squad I usually "trend up" in March. Brey has no depth, but his top-seven is very good and his teams tend to play better later in the season.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2018
Messages
3,777
Reaction Score
12,908
Notre Dame, along with Michigan State, is a squad I usually "trend up" in March. Brey has no depth, but his top-seven is very good and his teams tend to play better later in the season.
Normally yes, and maybe we will find out if that is true after we reflect in April. However, the games I have seen of them they look like soft p---ies, especially in their home game against Boston College where they were getting pushed around and needed 2 OTs to secure the victory.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
1,616
Reaction Score
14,196
Notre Dame, along with Michigan State, is a squad I usually "trend up" in March. Brey has no depth, but his top-seven is very good and his teams tend to play better later in the season.
Can I ask why you usually trend them up? They’ve made the Sweet 16 three times since 1987: 2003, 2015, and 2016, although the last two years were Elite Eight runs.

Michigan St. makes more sense, since they have made the Sweet 16 a total of 14 times since 1998, along with eight trips to the Final Four in that time.
 

Hans Sprungfeld

Undecided
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
13,057
Reaction Score
31,775
And entered the 06-07 season with the #4 ranked freshman class w/ Dyson, Thabeet, Wiggins, Stix, Kelly, Gavin Edwards and the Real Dove. The season was also the debut of AJ Price plus they had Jeff Adrien returning.

Virginia's '21 class was ranked 81st. Franklin/Gardner were good transfers, but you can't compare what UConn had coming in vs. UVA.
Post/handle
 

Online statistics

Members online
386
Guests online
2,255
Total visitors
2,641

Forum statistics

Threads
158,816
Messages
4,169,545
Members
10,040
Latest member
Thebug23


.
Top Bottom