Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BRS24, post: 4570216, member: 197"] Good morning to everyone except CC. [USER=9864]@YKCornelius[/USER] has some good points in prior post. Here's CC's latest from last night: [I]"In the final top-16 reveal, the NCAA committee leaned toward recent success over full body of work -- even though that hasn't been what the committee has prioritized in the past. This week, a nagging feeling has lingered that the trend will continue. So as we head into Selection Sunday, [B]Iowa[/B] has been elevated to the fourth No. 1 seed, dropping [B]Stanford[/B] to the 2-line. The Cardinal have a better overall résumé than Iowa, but the image of the Hawkeyes beating Indiana on a buzzer-beater in the regular-season finale then blowing out Ohio State in the Big Ten tournament title game might prove too much to ignore for this committee. Stanford losing in the Pac-12 tournament semifinals opened the door; the committee will push Iowa through it. [B]UConn[/B] also slides up the 2-line and to No. 5 overall. [B]Deciphering the paper-thin differences among the Huskies, Hawkeyes and Cardinal looms as the committee's most difficult task[/B]."[/I] My questions are still the seeding of Notre Dame and Duke, however entire body of work before post season and injuries may explain it. [ATTACH type="full"]84989[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]