Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="prankster, post: 4232239, member: 14"] Ok, it is Tuesday afternoon. NCAA tourney starts next week. Dempster has walked off the job and Swami is a no-call/no-show. So, we need a new Judge and a new Hangman if we expect to get anywhere this year. And, while these are prestigious sounding positions, there just ain't that much heavy liftin' involved. So, instead of an exhaustive round of taking applications, evaluating real life experience and uncovering some vast amount of lies and misrepresentations of various "letters of recommendation", etc. I propose that we solicit the functional equivalent of an "essay". Applicants for Judge shall deliver, in this thread, their proposed hangee(s); persuasive reasons why the miscreant(s) is (are) deserving (nominal infraction/justification); why they are considered sufficiently MOJO worthy, and what sentence is to be pronounced. Applicants for Hangman simply make up some BS about how the sentence is to be carried out and compliance verified (literally, any semi literate can do this part. Residence in a memory care facility is not required, but may be considered) All applicants will be consid..... ahem... mercilessly ridiculed. The successful candidates will be elevated by general acclamation. Let the games begin! [/QUOTE]