Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="selles, post: 2757961, member: 1176"] Or you could understand that contract law in American jurisprudence is grounded in economic efficiency and not morality. And that not only did Herbst and Benedict have the option to seek to fire KO for cause under the facts here, they arguably had a fiduciary duty to do so. And for those obsessed with whaling - er, wailing - and gnashing of teeth about the morality of all this, why is UConn any more immoral for using a contract clause to get out of paying KO $10 million despite the minor nature of the NCAA violations than KO is for using a contract clause to assert he's entitled to $10 million despite driving the program off a frigging cliff? [/QUOTE]