Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
Pro and UConn Soccer
Hartford/Elm City Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="ZooCougar, post: 2682751, member: 296"] NASL and USL were different flavors. NASL was focused on championships and competition and the USL was focused on becoming a farm system for MLS. The NASL was born out of some bigger clubs that were fed up with the USL/A League and wanted to get to a higher level of professionalism and mirror how leagues are run outside of the US. Some of these clubs actually ended up as expansion teams in MLS. The NASL was offered the deal that MLS has given USL now but they declined because they wanted to go in another direction. Some of it was good, some of it like challenging the MLS and trying to force an AFL/NFL style merger was a bit self destructive in my opinion and that is probably why they don't exist anymore. They made the wrong enemies. In the meantime they raised the bar and in response the USL stepped up their game and gained traction. Minnesota got picked up as an expansion team. The San Antonio Scorpions got sold to the San Antonio Spurs who only cared about getting into the MLS and cutting costs so they downgraded the team and moved to USL. In the meantime NASL was getting D2 status on a yearly basis. They wanted to get it 2-3 years at a time in order to attract owners who were looking for more stability. If the NASL hadn't been given D2 sanctioning in '17 then Rocco Commiso probably wouldn't have bought the Cosmos. The NASL barrier to entry was higher than USL and if they had been given a bit more stability in sanctioning many people think that they could have attracted better owners. For '18 there were supposed to be at least two expansion teams in California. One in San Diego and one called Cal FC that Eric Wynalda was going to manage. In the meantime most of the USL's "growth" has been through MLS2 sides. These teams have neither fanbases or identities. It would be like UConn Football sending the Practice Squad to a D3 Conference and calling it a new program. So much of this is smoke and mirrors. The USL also is rumored to have blackballed any team staffer from working in the USL if they took a job in the NASL. And they have offered cash to NPSL teams to switch to PDL. So in summary, NASL made some strategic mistakes, but the USSF doing what it could to shut down a league is a pretty bad look. The D2 sanctioning is somewhat worthless. It merely influences seeding in the US Open Cup. I think think this MLS basically taking control of pro soccer from end to end like MLB, NBA, NFL. They don't want any outliers or organizations that have a different vision/model. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
Pro and UConn Soccer
Hartford/Elm City Thread
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom