- Joined
- Sep 2, 2011
- Messages
- 1,684
- Reaction Score
- 2,889
When UConn is playing a team with seemingly more than one freshman, the tired excuses of "they're a young team", "what a job x coach is doing with so many young players".
I'm not speaking directly of craptastic intramural teams like BCU, but more like Rutgers, the Hall and last nighy WVU.
Last time I checked, Drummond just turned 18, Ryan and Daniels are freshman, and our grizzled starting lineup consists of one jr, AO, and 3 sophomores, Giff-eye, Bazz, Lamb, with the ubergeriatric Roscoe and Olander, both sophs, off the bench. Or at least Roscoe used to come in and play.
Let the announcers, pundits and coaches extravasate about the youth of the other team, so long as they remember that UConn is younger with better talent.
This is also a longwinded way of saying I wouldn't want to play UConn in the the first three (nee two) rounds of the NCAA's. It is a rock solid given this team advances to the sweet 16 come March.
I'm not speaking directly of craptastic intramural teams like BCU, but more like Rutgers, the Hall and last nighy WVU.
Last time I checked, Drummond just turned 18, Ryan and Daniels are freshman, and our grizzled starting lineup consists of one jr, AO, and 3 sophomores, Giff-eye, Bazz, Lamb, with the ubergeriatric Roscoe and Olander, both sophs, off the bench. Or at least Roscoe used to come in and play.
Let the announcers, pundits and coaches extravasate about the youth of the other team, so long as they remember that UConn is younger with better talent.
This is also a longwinded way of saying I wouldn't want to play UConn in the the first three (nee two) rounds of the NCAA's. It is a rock solid given this team advances to the sweet 16 come March.