Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="intlzncster, post: 2683305, member: 56"] Totally agree with you. I was just trying to compare in some fashion with last year using the following (extremely rough) assumptions: [LIST=1] [*]Get Wilson, but lose Larrier. Now people hate on TL, but he was good for 14pt 5rbs and 1assist per game. Wilson might replace that (hopefully at much better efficiency) but he hasn't played a minute of college ball yet. My conservative verdict was: that's a wash. [*]I can't count on AG until I see it. He may be perfectly healthy and balling, but we don't know yet. Subtract AA, and add some sort of AG. [/LIST] So, with a (very roughly) similar roster construction, plus improved players and coaching, sub .500 record shouldn't even be considered. I was just determining a bare minimum floor. Admittedly, not the most well thought out post. In sum: if Jalen is back, we will be north of .500. If not, we very well might not. [/QUOTE]