Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Good ESPN Article on the 99 Championship
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="auror, post: 3115601, member: 1329"] I watched the full game replay very recently and watched it live at the time. They were 11 AdjEM better over the season than us. That's the difference between this year's UConn and Villanova. It isn't a small gap. UConn were 9.5 point underdogs in Vegas. And if they played again, even after UConn won, I know that Duke would still be favored considerably by the bookmakers. It's dumb to use one game's worth of observations to make a grand claim about a team's ability, and there are people arguing that not only was UConn better in that game (which I agree with), but further that Duke was overrated in general... when they're literally the best rated team of the last 20 years with huge margin ahead of the pack. They won 33 games by double digits that year! Many champions don't even win 33 games total (like both 2011 and 2014 UConn teams). As to UConn being more battle-tested and more mentally tough... Duke went exactly as far as UConn did the previous season, but lost to the eventual champion by 2 points and missed a late deep 3 at the buzzer. They returned 5 of their top 6. Duke played 7 top 10 AP teams that year before the title game and beat all 7 with an average victory margin of over 10 points, and 5 of the 7 were on the road or neutral court. UConn played 4 top 10 games total, so Duke won more of them on neutral/road than UConn played total. It's great to come up with post hoc narratives because of how the one game played out, but it doesn't make them true. Duke was less mentally tough because Langdon's floater in the lane with 1 minute left rimmed out and then he traveled, but UConn is mentally tough despite El Amin airballing a floater with 30 seconds left and the team up 1? Unless the argument is that Duke was so good that they were inexperienced in close games, but I don't recommend making arguments that a team is overrated because they're too good. Avery, Battier, and Maggette (three future top 15 first round picks) went 8/26 and UConn's bench went 7/9 from 2. Did UConn play great defense? Abso-freaking-lutely we did. But those Duke guys literally shot over 60% from 2 on the season combined and got plenty of open shots due to the aggressive doubling of Brand. They just didn't make them in this 1 game sample [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Good ESPN Article on the 99 Championship
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom