Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Dogdeacon, post: 5272133, member: 1026"] Yes, I suppose you are right that a very relevant data point is what it might cost UConn to replace AK with similarly experienced player, an upperclassman that with a high-program stat line of 12+ppg and Alex's other #s might indeed cost $3M?! And given AK's veteran presence on the court in the locker room, knowledge of system and ability to make others better he may be worth more to UConn than his pure talent or per game #s imply. I guess where that breaks down is if UConn's total $ amount is say $15M it is tough to devote $3M to AK. Yet even if it is say $1M too high it'd still be a better return on investment than say ANY of last year's freshman NIL's provided. Ultimately a win some lose some perspective might be best until or if/when a system and caps/allocation becomes the new norm. [/QUOTE]