After the clip, the discussion (led by carton) devolved into sexist banter.
I am just going to call you out a bit here because I think it is important to distinguish between 'sexism' and clearly articulated indifference about a sport. If we use a 'loaded term' indiscriminately and or inaccurately we run the risk of creating a negative backlash and lessening it's effectiveness when we use it correctly.
Just because someone is not a fan of a sport does not make them sexist when that sport is a women's sport. I am not a fan of men's college basketball which does not make me a reverse sexist or a feminist or ______. It just means I don't like watching that sport and don't appreciate what others find exciting about it. Unlike many other discussions of Uconn and women's basketball, I thought they trod a fairly careful line of not being sexist - I didn't parse the whole conversation so their might have been a few dubious statements, but generally the discussion was 'what they are doing is phenomenal in any sport, but I am not interested in their sport, but because of their accomplishment we are discussing it, and I will watch if I get a chance just to see how they are doing what they do, just as I tuned into women's MMA because Rousey was so phenomenal and not because I have any particular interesting in MMA.
