Highly highly doubt it. That card is played too often.
I mean, the idea that race colors the way that we see people is just a reality, and that Black people are valued less in our society than White people is also a reality--that's not any kind of opinion, but just based in basically every statistical metric that could measure the well being of groups in our country.
I don't think it is a factor in this situation. Folks are pointing to Bob Diaco getting his buyout, but Diaco wasn't under an investigation and Diaco's buyout was more manageable. This decision is the result of being broke and nothing else.
With that being said, I don't really understand the argument of loyalty in college athletics to begin with. There is no place for loyalty, or even morality really, in the business of college sports. It's a corporation, and corporations only care about the bottom line and do what they can to secure their own best interest--why should we be any different? The only legitimate question should be whether claiming just cause serves our best future interests or not. I don't think that's the way college sports
should be, but it's the way that they are, and our failure to play by those rules (or lack of rules) has held us back for too long.