Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="msf22b, post: 3393782, member: 656"] The title of the thread may have more meaning than usual. In his pre-game presser, the first question Geno was asked (that we can hear) is his concern for Baylor's guard play...His answer was that he was more concerned with Baylor's front line. Baylor's quasi point had (not unexpected by me) a big evening...Geno playing possum?...who knows. According to one poster (and sorry I'm not even sure on which site and I cannot confirm) Liv was the only Husky with a plus/minor positive...plus one. I've never completely understood the implications and subtitles of that stat and ...a big and Liv was excluded from the 4th quarter carnage.... But if the stat is forward looking: Liv, despite her shooting woes might have had an overall positive effect on team play down the stretch... We'll never know. Certainly, in that final quarter, we matched up poorly...just bigger and better and fresher athletes on the B side. I also noted in another thread that our 4th quarter half-court offense left a lot to be desired. Would it have been different on either side of the ball with our dominant big present (even having a lackluster night) ....Just no way to know. In the past (when I was younger and more rambunctious) I was more likely to find fault with one or another of Geno's decision-making...not any more. But I would not be surprised if some of my concerns were mulled over by him or the staff on the ride home. One tiny aside: Kyla has come under intense scrutiny for her shortcomings on D and her (really too bad) inability to make (and later even take) her shot...But especially in the first half she defended like mad and Cox was good but more or less held in check. Can't ask anything more from a lesser athlete (much lesser). She helped us stay in the game. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,443

Messages: 4,396,427

Members: 10,209

Latest member: gemini*trvl