Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Geno is the reason other teams are better
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="willtalk, post: 2670397, member: 1220"] Every successful program is built on those successful programs which proceeded it. So in that way Geno certainly made his impact. What is more prevalent is that Geno does not appear to have played WCBB. That fact is a major factor in the development of the women's game. Up until recently most of the major or successful programs were coached by former players. The game today is is developing and changing at hyper speed from what it was when those former players were playing. Womens coaches initially were mostly women mostly because it was the only post college venue for players to stay in the game and make a living. The opportunities for making it as a professional player just didn't exist. This lack of opportunity sort of created a call for keeping the coaching gigs available for women. Many of which became coaches not because they were suited to coaching but because it was the only way to stay in basketball. Being a good coach does not require the skills as being a good player. Some of the best coaches were not really good players. The trend of WCBB being promoted exclusively for women was prevalent until recently. Recently combined with other professional opportunities for women and the increase of funding for women's programs there were more competent men getting into womens coaching. Now before I am inundated with accusations for being a sexist, let me make it clear that I do not believe that men are inherently better coaches. It is purely a matter of numbers and the previous back ground that men had in basketball as opposed to women who entered coaching. The women's game is catching up to the mens game via the increases skill level of the players and that requires change in coaching to adjust to that change. Men because of their past were less likely to be locked into the old style of womens basketball. I think that players coming out of the new systems will make excellent coaches that will eventually reverse the trend of the percentage of men dominating top level coaching in WCBB. It's purely a numbers game. One factor in Geno impacting WCBB was the fact that he was a man who became the dominant coach in the game. This along with increases funding and emphasis on Womens programs increased the amount of men who entered the field thus raised the standard of coaching over all. It is given that none of those mens coaches played WCBB. Most of them were not even good basketball players themselves so their success was not based on history as a player but their skills as a coach. It makes me wonder how many womens coaches were not actually good players?. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Geno is the reason other teams are better
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom