Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="bballnut90, post: 3436979, member: 2117"] Agree. Very comparable players when you look at their career and impact. I do think SC was more advanced prior to A'ja than ND was prior to Sky, but A'ja got them to a title and Skylar came up just short so it evens out. And agree regarding Ionescu. She absolutely needs to win a title to be in consideration with the next group. EDD is kind of a weird one. Skill wise she's absolutely up there with the best of the best, but playing at Delaware she didn't really challenge herself or ever compete against good competition. I looked it up a while back, but I think she played against like 3-4 ranked opponents in her entire career. For that I can't include her in either the top or 2nd tier grouping since she was irrelevant during her collegiate career when you look at her effect during women's college basketball from 2009-2013. IMO she's in her own side category since no one else that talented has played at such a low level. If she didn't go on to be a great WNBA player and Olympian, no one would include her on any of these lists IMO. [/QUOTE]