- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 13,917
- Reaction Score
- 25,941
Please don't tell me Boise was 2-1. Do we have another game with them somewhere? Or is your 2018 wrong
2018 is the return game, Free.Please don't tell me Boise was 2-1. Do we have another game with them somewhere? Or is your 2018 wrong
Rare to never?When was the last time any SEC team traveled North of Lexington, KY?
I posted this on an OOC scheduling thread when I heard it about a year ago the reaction here was not good. I bring it up again because I heard it again two weeks ago.
Warde and Bates have talked about a 1-2-1 series. 1 @ Gillette (split gate), 1@ Chestnut Hill, 1 @Rent, 1@ Chestnut Hill.
OK, fire away.
Well, it's a year later and it hasn't gotten done. I would also do it.I posted this on an OOC scheduling thread when I heard it about a year ago the reaction here was not good. I bring it up again because I heard it again two weeks ago.
Warde and Bates have talked about a 1-2-1 series. 1 @ Gillette (split gate), 1@ Chestnut Hill, 1 @Rent, 1@ Chestnut Hill.
OK, fire away.
I vote no. It's BC for heaven sakes. Ask yourself would you do that deal with Wake Forest or Illinois? That is a comparable level here. That is basically the deal they gave UMass. We have zero need to play those guys. It would be nice but not worth setting a bad precedent. You do it for them and you will never get another 1-1 with Rutgers Syracuse or anyone.
This reminds me of the hubris some of us were spouting about the ND series. We should have signed that deal. I understand the politicos got into the mix but we should have done it. And I would enthusiastically support this proposed arrangement. For obvious reasons that go far beyond the details of this proposal with BC, our football program needs exposure and a full stadium. Bring on some rivalry hoopla and excitement. Bring on BC. And if we happen to get invited to a P-5 during the duration of the deal there's always a way to renegotiate the venues with our Boston rivals. Just ask Tennessee.I vote no. We have zero need to play those guys.....not worth setting a bad precedent.
Our football program will get exposure and excitement if we win games. We have 1-1 series with UVA, IU, ILL, SU, Mizzou. Even BYU and BSU have more prestige than BC. Do NOT set the precedent than schools in the bottom half of the P5 can get 2-1's with us - it will severely hamper future scheduling efforts and diminish us in the conference realignment landscape.This reminds me of the hubris some of us were spouting about the ND series. We should have signed that deal. I understand the politicos got into the mix but we should have done it. And I would enthusiastically support this proposed arrangement. For obvious reasons that go far beyond the details of this proposal with BC, our football program needs exposure and a full stadium. Bring on some rivalry hoopla and excitement. Bring on BC. And if we happen to get invited to a P-5 during the duration of the deal there's always a way to renegotiate the venues with our Boston rivals. Just ask Tennessee.
LSU is at Cuse this year. Bama has played at Penn State numerous times and Arkansas was at RU in 2013When was the last time any SEC team traveled North of Lexington, KY?
BC is NOT Notre Dame. They are a lower rung P5 program. We can and have gotten 1-1 with those teams and should not worry too much if BC won't do that deal. But we should not do 2-1 with them. All you guys willing to sign on for that seem to ignore the fact that so far mid-tier teams WILL come to the Rent. Even some better than mid tier will. It has nothing to do with hubris. It is about protecting the program. If we can get Syracuse UMass Rutgers Army on the schedule eventually we'll get BC too.Our football program will get exposure and excitement if we win games. We have 1-1 series with UVA, IU, ILL, SU, Mizzou. Even BYU and BSU have more prestige than BC. Do NOT set the precedent than schools in the bottom half of the P5 can get 2-1's with us - it will severely hamper future scheduling efforts and diminish us in the conference realignment landscape.
John Greene said:I posted this on an OOC scheduling thread when I heard it about a year ago the reaction here was not good. I bring it up again because I heard it again two weeks ago.
Warde and Bates have talked about a 1-2-1 series. 1 @ Gillette (split gate), 1@ Chestnut Hill, 1 @Rent, 1@ Chestnut Hill.
OK, fire away.
Add one more at the Rent and it's a done deal.