They're continuing to do a good job of getting nowhere remotely close to the West Coast for any of the Final 4 sites.
For kicks and giggles I looked at previous sites. 2012 Denver was the last time a site was west of Texas. Before that you have to go all the way back to 1999 in San Jose. The early years were pretty good--LA '84, Tacoma '88 & '89, LA '92. But nothing since '99. Kinda stinks. People do actually live all the way out here. Some even show up to sporting events. Seattle had good turnout for women's volleyball Final 4 in 2013.
Which west coast sites bid?
Also, NCAA requires at least 17k seats.
That takes out Seattle.
eligible: Portland, Denver, Salt Lake, Provo (BYU), Las Vegas, Phoenix, Sacramento, SF/Oak, LA
- Portland may be in contention next round if they do well in hosting the regionals in the coming years.
- I doubt the NCAA is interested in LA, or vice versa. Ditto Provo. (for very different reasons)
I think they used about half the arena for the women.I was surprised to see San Antonio on the list, I figured the NCAA didnt want to return to a huge dome for the final 4.... and the NBA Arena isn't close to the the Riverwalk, hotels, convention center. Its gonna be interesting to see how they configure the seating.
If they want a GOOD show then they should have picked Las Vegas.Thing to keep in mind is good ol Opportunity Cost from Econ 101.
Any arena that hosts the F4, has be available for 4 days when it could be hosting other money-making events. NYC & LA arenas are busy almost year-round. They're not going to sit empty for 2 nights and get mediocre revenue from the womens' final 4. Arenas get concession money, and I presume (?) a portion of the gate. I'm quite confident that WF4 ticket prices and alcohol&food consumption are much lower than they are for an NBA game or major concert.
Arenas in non mega cities like Cleveland & Minneapolis are likely not full year round, so this is a good option for them.
Also some cities may already have booked conventions which take up the hotel rooms.
And the committee will want cities that can not only put on a good show, support the event, and has enough reasonably-priced hotel rooms.
Thing to keep in mind is good ol Opportunity Cost from Econ 101.
Any arena that hosts the F4, has be available for 4 days when it could be hosting other money-making events. NYC & LA arenas are busy almost year-round. They're not going to sit empty for 2 nights and get mediocre revenue from the womens' final 4. Arenas get concession money, and I presume (?) a portion of the gate. I'm quite confident that WF4 ticket prices and alcohol&food consumption are much lower than they are for an NBA game or major concert.
Arenas in non mega cities like Cleveland & Minneapolis are likely not full year round, so this is a good option for them.
Also some cities may already have booked conventions which take up the hotel rooms.
And the committee will want cities that can not only put on a good show, support the event, and has enough reasonably-priced hotel rooms.
I have no idea why Charlotte doesn't bid for this. It would be a great location (no real bias here) The arena location right downtown.... the convention center a few blocks from the arena. Thousands of hotel rooms, hundreds of restaurants, within walking distance.... the Light Rail Stop right at the doorstep of the arena
I'd love the Final Four to be held in Columbia.
I imagine the committee wants to avoid playing the title on the home floor of a major team. Charlotte or Atlanta would seem like your best hope.
Wasn't the Final Four in Ohio State's home arena this year?
Why didn't you say Greensboro? I'd love the Final Four to be held in Columbia.
Has Atlanta hosted a women's Final Four since 2003? Odd as they are a host site for so many NCAA and SEC championship events. Being a major airport is a huge reason.I imagine the committee wants to avoid playing the title on the home floor of a major team. Charlotte or Atlanta would seem like your best hope.