Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 4985885, member: 1673"] Sounds like I hit a nerve. Most of your rebuttal does not really address my claims. Reading comp? But one of your assertion does and even makes sense, so here is my counter. Post 2000 there are more low seed upsets than before 2000, including the only 16 seed upsets. I stated that we are now near the beginning of seeing that trend reversed. If I am wrong and you are right then we will see 13-16 seeded upsets at the same frequency as occurred up until this year, most coming from mid-majors. If I am right that frequency will decrease, for reasons your other comments indicate you seem to miss which, ironically, actually proves your point that my post was a waste of time. FWIW, as a UConn fan I am ultimately OK with how 40% turnover makes the rich get richer. [/QUOTE]