Shocked, shocked to see what team you root for.
Glad you can read and comprehend.Shocked, shocked to see what team you root for.
An individual ranking, no teams are involved.
Team success has to be part of the criteria, otherwise it's lacking context. How many players from mediocre or bad teams do you see here?
It's always perspective guy.
Yeah I can see that. She's great. But it's a tough list. I think they got most of the right players but the order is kinda arbitrary. I like Betts a lot but she's ahead of Cardoso, Reese, Holmes, Lee and Kiki? Amoore being 7 and Sheldon being 16 is kinda wild but I'm no scout. It's all pretty close.
To this point, I do think Betts is as good as the others, but her production hasn't been quite there. Like I think Betts wins a matchup against Mackenzie Holmes but Holmes is super productive so I would rank her ahead of Betts. And also to Crazyhorse point, Latson and Rickea Jackson probably are too low if I'm just looking at individual player talent. It's fun to think about and always a topic of debate, like how do u actually rank players.
Sadly my main thought is how #2 and #5 both had Stanford in their short list right up to signing day, but went elsewhere. Oh what might have been...Just wanted to post it here. What are your thoughts. I thought it was pretty fair.
Caitlin Clark, then who? Ranking the top 25 women's basketball players
Caitlin Clark a unanimous No. 1? No surprise. But a freshman has taken over No. 2 in ESPN's player rankings, which includes four rookies overall.www.espn.com
That, and #9 transferred out of Stanford. But you are pretty good with what you have!
Yeah, because them guards y'all have will be the death of you in the post season.