Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Alydar, post: 4592432, member: 730"] Are you by any chance an attorney? Because lawyers get paid to argue for one side of things and if they are clever make it appear balanced. It was a good article if it meant to be about teams that beat UConn. And for that reason I can't see how you found it balanced. The title mentions "resurgence" but Voepel makes no mention of that. Funny, but most of the season ESPN emphasised "14 straight FF's" as the record to go down but now that it's probably more likely than not that a 15th is in the cards FF's are off-topic as ESPN returns to 11 titles. ESPN writes pieces about a lot of the teams. Right below the UConn article is a nice glowing and optimistic piece about the Gamecocks program highlighting their successes. Not a hint at what could go wrong for them. The UConn article, just like their preseason look at UConn back in November, is nothing but negativity, a list of lost big games. It may be accurate but it is hardly a representive assessment. I'll guarrantee that if UConn and SCar were to meet Voepel will not review the entire record of the series and will focus on Dawn's wins over Geno. And in a way that's a compliment from ESPN. The best evidence for UConn's position in the wcbb pecking order is that they are the most disliked as well as the most popular program. In the amended words of Reggie, [I][B]UConn is the straw that stirs the drink. [/B][/I] [/QUOTE]