Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CocoHusky, post: 4008519, member: 5823"] There is no relationship to the state legislation because the state legislation has nothing to do with NCAA eligibility. Think about it- Azzi resides in Virginia and plays basketball in CT and operates a national online clothing business. Which state would allow her to start the pistol? The answer is no state. The NCAA is the one that will decide if/when Azzi can resume her online clothing business and still maintain her eligibility. The intention of the state legislation was to get the NCAA to act and now that the NCAA has acted the numerous state legislations have become obsolete. Simple example: Azzi would lose her eligibility if she were to endorse alcohol, tobacco, gambling or adult-type products per the NCAA NIL guidelines. Virtually none of the pending or implemented state legislations had all of these restrictions. Then there are students like Nika and Dorka-which state would govern their NIL rights. [/QUOTE]