Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Bear11, post: 2639068, member: 7934"] I would be interested to see these articles advocating for RPI. I have not seen them. [URL="http://www.slate.com/articles/sports/sports_nut/2011/03/ratings_madness.html"]Basketball RPI: Why it's a lousy way to pick teams for the NCAA Tournament.[/URL] [URL="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-ncaa-is-modernizing-the-way-it-picks-march-madness-teams/"]The NCAA Is Modernizing The Way It Picks March Madness Teams[/URL] [URL="https://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/rpi-prediction/"]The RPI is Not the Real Predictive Indicator[/URL] [URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fancy-stats/wp/2018/02/12/rpi-appears-to-have-too-much-influence-in-the-ncaa-tournament-seeding-process/"]Analysis | RPI appears to have too much influence in the NCAA tournament seeding process[/URL] [URL="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1562228-march-madness-why-rpi-is-not-a-great-measurement-of-a-teams-ability"]March Madness: Why RPI Is Not a Great Measurement of a Team's Ability[/URL] [URL="http://www.bigbluehistory.net/bb/rpi.html"]The Ratings Percentage Index Myth[/URL] [URL="https://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2015/1/28/7922527/kansas-jayhawks-kentucky-wildcats-rpi-strength-of-schedule"]RPI doesn't (and shouldn't) matter[/URL] [/QUOTE]