Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Vuce, post: 3489497, member: 89"] 2006 on paper is better than 1990. But if I was going to pick I’d take the DS team. They were kinda opposites of each other. 2006 was really the pick not only in the conference but nationally a lot of pundits expected them to be there at the end. 1990, not picked to do anything in conference after coming off a disappointing 1988-89 season and losing their best 2 players. Chemistry wise that 2006 team just seem to never be able to get on the same page no matter what JC tried. The NCAA tournament for our 2006 team was so frustrating as we almost lost to Albany, Kentucky and Washington before finally losing to Mason. 1990 was the total opposite rolling through the first two rounds then playing back to back classic games. Expectations have a lot to do with both of them as just about everyone thought 2006 should and would be there at the end. 1990 was like a snowball that kept building beyond anyone’s expectations. Good stuff! [/QUOTE]